Experiment 7 Network economies of scale: The Holophone
7.5 Student instructions
Introduction
Having your own phone is not of much use if your friends do not have phones. And what use is it to have an email account if the people you want to send messages to do not have email accounts too? The technology for the fax, a device to send images of documents over a telephone line, was first patented by Alexander Bain in 1843, but fax machines were still rare as late as 1980. Suddenly, they became so popular that by the mid1980s almost every office had at least one fax machine. A defining characteristic of this type of good is that it becomes more valuable to everyone as more people purchase it.
This experiment explores the workings of a market for such a good. It introduces the Holophone:^{1} a smartphone that communicates with holographic images. It is a more advanced way of communicating, but you can communicate with someone only if both of you have Holophones. Will Holophones make smartphones a thing of the past or will they fade away and make buying them a waste of money?
Instructions
The network externality factor represents the benefits of one user on another, occurring because the two are connected in a network.
In this experiment, you will take part in a market of Holophones. Your task is to make a decision whether to purchase a Holophone at an announced price or not, with the aim of maximizing your payoff. The payoff is determined by the difference between the price paid and your buyer value. Your buyer value will be determined by two factors: your initial value and the usability of the Holophone, measured by the network externality factor (NEF), which is determined by the number of other participants who also have a Holophone.
At the beginning of the experiment, you are informed of your initial value—that is, how much you value a Holophone even if nobody else has one. (About onesixth of participants have each of the possible initial values ranging from 1 to 6.) However, you will not know your buyer value until the end of the round, since it is contingent on both your initial value and the total number of Holophones sold, according to the following formula:
The NEF is determined by the total number of participants who buy a Holophone according to a conversion table that will be displayed at the beginning of the session. The NEF table and your initial value are maintained for all rounds.
In each round of this experiment, the instructor, who is the only seller, will announce the price of a Holophone. The price is the same for the entire round. You will see the number of units sold on your instructor’s screen, as buying orders start coming. If you want to buy a unit, you need to send the order through your device (Figure A). Your instructor may also ask you to stand up or move to a designated area in the room to provide a more visual picture of the number of phones sold. Observe that you can only buy one unit or none, and that it is not possible to change the decision once you have sent it.
Once the round is closed, the NEF is calculated and you will receive feedback with your buyer value and your profits (or losses), that is, your buyer value minus the price you paid. If you decide not to buy, you will receive a profit of zero. Zero profits are better than obtaining a loss by paying a price higher than your buyer value.
It is very important that you abide by the rules described by your instructor. In particular, you must not make public announcements, no matter how tempting it might become.
Warmup questions
You can use the following questions to test your understanding of the rules.
Suppose that the network externality factors (NEF) are as given in Figure B.
If the number of units sold is between  NEF is 

0 and 8  1 
9 and 16  2 
17 and 24  3 
25 and 32  4 
33 and 40  5 
41 or more  6 
 Suppose 11 students bought a Holophone.
 What is the NEF?
 Suppose that Holophones sell for €20 and your initial value is 6. If you were one of the buyers, what would be your profit or loss?
 Suppose that Holophones sell for €12, that 36 students have already bought a Holophone, and that you will be the last student to buy.
 If your initial value is 3, what would be your profit (loss) from buying a Holophone?
 If your initial value is 2, what would be your profit (loss)?
 Suppose that Holophones sell for €8. Your initial value is 3, and 16 students have already bought a Holophone. Should you buy?
 Your initial value is 3, and you bought a Holophone for €5. What is the minimum number of units that other students must buy for you to make a strictly positive profit?

 NEF = 2
 Your buyer value is . Since you paid €20, you lose €8.

 With 37 users, including yourself, NEF = 5 and your buyer value is . Since you pay €12, your profits are €3.
 Now, your buyer value is , and you lose €2.
 If you buy one unit, there will be 17 users, including yourself. NEF = 3, your buyer value will be , and your profits .
 To make a strictly positive profit, you need a buyer value of €6 or higher. Since your initial value is 3, the NEF must be at least 2. That is, a minimum of eight other students must buy a unit.
7.8 Homework questions
Your instructor shared with you the following information regarding the experiment: the network externality factors table; the distribution of initial values; and the price, the number of units sold, and the network externality factor for each round.
A. Finding equilibria with a noregrets demand curve
Drawing the noregrets demand curve
When we draw a demand curve for a good with network economies of scale, it is convenient to do so by finding the price(s) at which each quantity will be demanded. This is so because when there are network economies of scale, each person’s buyer values depend on the total number of units sold. For each quantity , define to be the buyer value of ‘the last buyer’ when exactly units are sold.^{2}
 Observe that, because all buyers share the same NEF, the ‘last buyer’ is the buyer with the lowest initial value: participants with higher initial values should buy first. Because there are six different initial values, there are six ranges of quantities such that is constant over each range. Complete the table in Figure C for these ranges for the different values of .
Quantity range  Network externality factor NEF  Lowest initial value (decreasing sorted) IV(q)  P(q) in this range NEF × IV(q) 

1 to _  1  6  €6 
_ to _  2  5  €10 
_ to _  3  4  €12 
_ to _  4  3  €12 
_ to _  5  2  €10 
_ to _  6  1  €6 
 Use the first and last columns in Figure C to draw a graph of the noregrets demand curve . Add a vertical line segment corresponding to zero sales at each price above €6, and draw vertical line segments to fill in the jumps between the horizontal line segments in your graph of . Your graph should look like the one in Figure D.
Finding the equilibria
 On your graph, draw a horizontal supply curve at a price of €20. What is the equilibrium quantity at this price?
 In Round 2, the price was €20. How many units were sold in this round? How many of the buyers made positive profits? How many of the buyers took losses? If there had been a third round where the price was still €20, how many Holophones do you think would have been sold?
 On your graph, draw (perhaps using a different colour) a horizontal supply curve at a price of €11. What are the equilibrium quantities with this new supply curve?
 In Round 3, the price was €11. How many units were sold? Is the quantity outcome of the round closer to ‘low level’ or to the ‘high level’ of the equilibria you found for a price of €11?
 If your group ran Round 4, repeat questions 5 and 6 for a price of €9 (the price of a unit in Round 4).
Stability of equilibria
 Suppose that the price is €11 and the market is stuck to the lowlevel equilibrium where nobody buys a Holophone. The market reopens and only one or two students buy a unit. Will they get positive profits? Would they return the unit and get their money back if they could? Observe that for small deviations, the dynamics pull the situation back to the lowlevel equilibrium.
 The price is still €11, but suppose now that the market has attained the highlevel equilibrium. A new opportunity arises for buyers to change their mind. Those who did not buy a Holophone can buy one unit, and those who bought one unit may return it and get their money back. Check whether (a) if anyone returned a Holophone, they would buy it back; and (b) if there were one more sale, the buyer would return it. Observe that, for small deviations, the dynamics pull the situation back to the highlevel equilibrium.
 Finally, suppose that the price is €9 and that the market is stuck at the lowlevel equilibrium where nobody buys a Holophone. The government is interested in the expansion of the use of these new devices and decides to subsidize units which are offered at a reduced price of €5 each, where is the number of students with an initial value of 6. What do you think would happen to the total number of units sold? (If your group ran Round 5, compare your answer to the outcome of that round.)
B. An example with a large number of users
In this example, we extend the analysis to a very large number of users. Consider the pool of smartphone owners. A new video and filesharing network is launched. The value to each owner of joining this new network depends on their personal interest to join in (their initial value) and the fraction of users (that is, those smartphone owners who have already joined). We identify each owner by a number in the interval from 0 to 1, with 0 and 1 representing the most and the leastinterested owner, respectively. In particular, the initial value of owner is , and if a share of owners joins the network, the buyer value of user is . For example, if the share of users is 50% (), the buyer value of owner (who has the highest 30% initial value) is , that is, they would be willing to pay up to 0.35 euros to join the network.
 Suppose that the cost of joining the network is €0.21. Hence, everybody whose buyer value would like to join. If 50% of owners have already joined, compute the share of owners who would like to join the network by solving the equation . We will call them the expected users.
 Using a graphic calculator (like Geogebra), draw the share of expected users as a function of the number of actual users (). Recall that the price is €0.21 and notice that the share of expected users cannot be less than 0.
 On the same graph, draw the 45° line through the origin and find the intersections of both functions. You should obtain a graph similar to Figure E. Each intersection represents an equilibrium, because the expected share of users coincides with the actual share of users. (You could also compute the equilibria analytically.)
Now, let’s study the dynamics offequilibrium.
 Suppose that the actual share of users is to the left of point B. Find the expected number of users, who will become the new share of users. Continuing this argument, show that the dynamics will lead to point A with no users.
 Repeat the previous argument for a share of users between points B and C, and for a share of users to the right of point C.
 Using questions 4 and 5, argue that A and C represent stable equilibria, while B is an unstable equilibrium.
 If you want to practice more, repeat the whole analysis for other prices, for example , , or . You will discover that for prices higher than €0.25, the only equilibrium is no users.
7.9 Further reading
 Section 7.3 in The Economy 2.0: Microeconomics (Section 7.2 in The Economy 1.0) and Section 21.4 in The Economy 1.0, discuss the concept of network economies of scale. Section 20.8 in The Economy 1.0 presents an analysis of the stability of equilibria applied to an environmental context, where tipping points play the role of the critical mass in this experiment. Section 1.2 in The Economy 2.0: Microeconomics (Section 1.3 in The Economy 1.0) introduces the hockey stick concept to describe a time graph.
 The discussion of Experiment 9 ‘Network Externalities’ in Theodore Bergstrom and John Miller. 2000. Experiments with Economic Principles: Microeconomics (2nd ed.). McGrawHill Education, pp. 255–266 still offers an excellent theoretical analysis of network economies of scale particularly tailored to this experiment.
 Ernie G.S. Teo. 2015. ‘Emergence, Growth, and Sustainability of Bitcoin: The Network Economics Perspective’. (chapter 9.1 in The Handbook of Digital Currency, edited by David Lee Kuo Chuen, Academic Press) discusses network effects and how they affect a cryptocurrency’s emergence and growth.
 J. C. Coopersmith. 2014. ‘STARS: Fax Machines [Scanning our Past]’ (in Proceedings of the IEEE 102 (11): pp. 1858–1865.doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2360032) shows how the fax machine turned from being a niche product for more than a hundred years to become, within the space of ten years, an indispensable machine in almost every office.