8.5: 'Competitive equilibrium gains  from trade allocation and distribution'.   As economists, we always say competitive markets  are efficient, competitive markets are efficient,   but what do we mean by that? We mean that  the competitive markets maximise the mutual benefits for the consumers and producers. Let me  explain. Let's focus on the benefits going to the consumers. We call that consumer surplus. Let's  focus on the customer who is buying the 1,000 loaves of bread. When that customer is walking off  the bakery, he must have a smile on his face, why? Because he bought that loaf of bread for €2 while  he was willing to pay a much higher price for that bread. So that was a surplus going to that  consumer. Have you found yourself in a situation that you purchased the product and secretly  you were willing to pay a much higher price for that product? That was a consumer surplus  going to you. Let me give you another example. Let's focus on the customers who purchased  the 3,000 loaves of bread. Again that customer is happy when he's walking off the bakery, why?  Because he purchased the loaf of bread for €2 while he was willing to pay a higher price than  €2, but this time you see the consumer surplus is smaller compared to the previous customer,  so this area represents all the surplus going to the consumers, why? Because all the demanders  here, on our demand line, were willing to buy bread a loaf of bread for a price higher than  €2 but in the end they end up just paying €2. We can think about the same concept but from  a perspective of firms. We call that producer surplus. Let's focus on the baker who's selling  the 1,000 loaves of bread. That baker must have a smile at the time he's selling that bread, why?  Because he's selling that loaf of bread at a much higher price than he was willing to supply that  bread at. Remember: this is the supply curve, which in this case is the same as the marginal  cost curve, because we are operating on the competitive market. So, just to repeat: that  baker is selling the bread at a much higher price than he was willing to supply that bread at, and  that difference is a producer surplus - a benefit going to the baker. So if we put these  two sides together, we realise that when the baker was selling the 1,000 loaves of bread  and the customer was buying that loaf of bread, they both benefitted from this transaction.  There was a surplus going to the consumer and a surplus going to the producer. However,  this does not mean that both of these sides equally benefit if, for instance, in the case  of the 1,000 loaves of bread you see that the benefits going to the consumer is higher  than the benefits going to the producer. But from an aggregate perspective, you see that  the competitive markets maximise this area. They maximise the surplus going to the consumers  and producers. They maximize the joint surplus. Finally, let me compare a competitive market  with the monopoly market from a perspective of efficiency. Let me start with the monopoly market.  The most important thing here is that we have wasted opportunities. We've got a deadweight loss  which we show in this graph by this area. Now, let me explain to you how a monopoly ends  up hurting the consumers. At the moment, Beautiful Cars is maximising their profits  by charging $5,440 for each of their cars. Remember: they're pricing  each of their cars the same and they are selling 32 cars overall and  this way they're maximising their profits. Now let's assume we have a customer, an  additional customer who wants to buy the 33rd car and that customer is willing to pay  around $4,000, let's say, for that additional car. At the same time, the cost of producing  another car, the marginal cost of the 33rd car for Beautiful Cars is lower than the  price that that customer is willing to pay, but Beautiful Cars never produces the 33rd  car, why? Because if they want to serve that customer they have to lower their price  for all of their cars and they end up making less profit on the other 32 cars and in this  way they end up making a lower total profit. Because of that, Beautiful Cars stops at 32 cars  and they decide not to serve that 33rd customer and in this way you see a wasted opportunity: a  consumer benefit that was never realised. This is a good example of how a monopoly market is not  efficient. Now let me focus on the competitive market. There you got no missed opportunities:  all the mutually beneficial transactions that could have taken place between the consumers  and producers have actually taken place. There is no deadweight loss. The competitive market  has maximised the surplus going to the consumers and producers and in that sense we say that  competitive markets are Pareto efficient.